IELTS Writing Task 1 assesses a candidate’s ability to interpret and summarize data from visual sources, such as pie charts, tables, or graphs. This task requires identifying main trends, significant features, or patterns and making relevant comparisons. A well-structured response with accurate grammar, clear vocabulary, and logical organization is key to achieving a high score.
Using IELTS Writing practice papers helps candidates become familiar with various types of visuals, like pie charts illustrating household expenditures of an average family across different years. Regular practice allows candidates to quickly identify main features, organize responses effectively, and make meaningful comparisons, enhancing clarity, accuracy, and overall performance in the IELTS writing section.
Topic:
Pie chart below give information about the household expenditures of an average vs family in different years. summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features
Band 8 IELTS Answer
To begin with, we'll analyze the normal family consumption within the US between 1970 and 2004. In common, the primary chart shows that childcare received the slightest sum of cash out of the complete group. Shockingly, the contract from the moment chart is where individuals spend the foremost.
The contract had the most noteworthy rate in 1970, at 26%, whereas nourishment and clothing were to some degree smaller, at 25% and 22%, individually. They went through the same sum on transportation and excitement (13 percent). In any case, childcare accounted for as it were 1% of add up to investing, the littlest among the other categories. Contract, nourishment, and clothing each account for over a fourth of to costs in 1970. The contract, on the other hand, has overwhelmed consumption for the past 34 years. In 1970, a family went through as it were 1% of its pay on childcare, while a family in 2004 paid 10 times as much.
Within the occurrence of contracts, the design was nearly turned around after 34 years (50 percent ). Investing overwhelmed, and the percentage expanded by over half of what it was sometime recently 34 a long time. On the moment chart, the contract was moreover the foremost prevalent alternative, rising triple. Whereas contracts expanded in 2004. Other family uses such as clothing, nourishment, and transportation seen a minor decrease, reaching 10%, 12%, and 5%, individually. After thirty-four a long time, in any case, amusement was succeeded by a phase of solidness. Childcare was unfavorably related, and it climbed quickly from 9% to 10%.
Band 7.5 IELTS Answer
The two pie charts below show data approximately the family costs of a normal family in two diverse periods, specifically 1970 and 2004. Generally, the contract is the most elevated cost in both periods, other life costs are essentially lower within the later year. In profundity, the contract cost in 1970 takes around a quarter of the family income, this number pairs in 2004 with 50% of the use goes to contract, in differentiate, nourishment, clothing and transport within the year 1970 costs were higher by nearly 50%, diminishing from 22% to 10% for clothing, 25% to 10% for nourishment, and 13% to 5% for transport.
On the other hand, childcare had a sensational increase starting from 1% in 1970 to 10% within the following period. Additionally, the amusement consumption stay unaltered in both for a long time taking up 13%.
Band 7 IELTS Answer
The pie charts below outline grant six pieces of information about the household in 1970 and 2004. In general, it is obvious that the contract had the most noteworthy rate in two years.
Agreeing to the graph, in 1970 contract stood within the to begin with put (26%). In addition, food with the marginal contrast from contract stood within the second put (25%) and clothing with the 3 contrast from nourishment stood within the third put whereas, in 2004 50% of that chart belonged to the contract. Besides, clothing and childcare had the same percent (10%). Too, transport had the most reduced percent approximately 5%. In expansion, excitement with the 1% from nourishment stood within the moment put in 2004 though, in 1970 childcare had the lowest rate precisely 1%. Too, transport and amusement had the same percent (13%).
As a result, it is clear that the contract had the most noteworthy percentages in 1970 and 2004. Moreover, in 1970 childcare had the most reduced rate whereas in 2004 transport stood within the final put.
Comments