Growing Interest in Relationship Between Equality and Personal Achievement IELTS Writing Task 2

Sayantani Barman

Mar 5, 2024

Growing Interest in the Relationship Between Equality and Personal Achievement IELTS Writing Task 2 is an essay topic that has 3 sample answers. The topic of the IELTS Writing Task 2 discusses Growing Interest in the Relationship Between Equality and Personal Achievement. The candidate has to talk about both views. So, to support the point, proper sentence structure, a grammatically correct approach, and reasonable explanations are necessary.

IELTS Writing Task 2 includes an introduction, body, & conclusion to assist applicants in achieving a good score in the writing section. Candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a wide range of themes. Growing Interest in relationship Between Equality and Personal Achievement IELTS Writing Task 2 because the topics are broad.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check
:
Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: In recent years, there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possible only if individuals are free to succeed or fail according to their individual merits.Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Band 8 IELTS Essay

In later years, there has been a developing interest within the relationship between correspondence and individual accomplishment. A few individuals accept that people can accomplish more in populist social orders. Others accept that tall levels of individual accomplishment are conceivable as it were in case people are free to succeed or fall flat agreeing to their merits. What is your view of the relationship between balance and individual victory?

The relationship between correspondence and individual achievements has gained critical consideration within the final few a long time. A few claim that a reasonable society can energize their people to succeed as they treat everybody within the same way, whereas others contradict that individual accomplishment as a result of victory and disappointment is based on their merits. I solidly accept that a combination of both equal and individualistic approaches is the key to victory.

To start with, sex uniformity isn't as it were a fundamental right but moreover a fundamental establishment for a tranquil and affluent life. It is very fundamental to utilize the complete human potential for sustainable development. For illustration, in Western nations, Ladies are similarly regarded and given openings as Men. In any case, in the middle east nations or Eurasia, they don't have the same mentality and Ladies are still alluded to as inferior to Men. We see a reasonable contrast in both western and eastern countries' thriving which gives us an understanding of the libertarian society's part in giving rise to openings to Men and Ladies, to wealthy and destitute, to upper course and lower class.

On the other hand, an individualistic approach is the moment step after getting break even with openings from an libertarian society because it as it were makes great conditions, but a person is mindful for taking the opportunity and making an exertion to attain the objective for its positive result. In the event that we take an illustration of the positioning scoreboard, it can offer assistance to assess the individuals' exhibitions on their merits.

To conclude, both balance and individual victory are interdependent. Giving break even with openings to all people is the to begin with step to reasonable incorporation, and Person execution is the moment step to flourishing.

Band 7.5 IELTS Essay

There's a solid interest in correspondence and individual accomplishment in today's world. In my conclusion, these terms are distinctive from each other. There must be balance in human beings' rights, but balance in accomplishment can not be considered reasonable.

There must be quality in instruction for each individual independent of their religion or family status. Everyone has the right to urge a great instruction, and the government should provide offices so that instruction will be free for all. In the event that it isn't free, at that point it should be less cheap so that no one hesitates to induce an education. For case, To induce confirmation to a well-known school/college, now and then we ought to pay a few additional cash, and it isn't a great sign in our society, and due to this, a few understudies cannot manage their costs and miss the chance to connect their preferred institute.

On the other hand, balance in work accomplishment isn't a great sign, and one ought to get a prize as per their merits. For illustration, IT division occupations have distinctive parts, and everybody utilized needs to work as per their assignment assignments. In case we allow rise to significance to each one, then the one who is giving additional exertion to the work will feel demotivated, influencing their execution. Moreover, in case we allow a rise in compensation to each one, it may offer assistance to keep up a great work environment, but it'll be disrespectful for the one who has the most noteworthy information compared to the others.

In conclusion, it is sweet to have uniformity in a few zones, but we ought to too pay consideration to people's information.

Band 7 IELTS Essay

A populist society is one in which everybody has the same rights and openings. I concur that individuals can accomplish more in this kind of society. Instruction is a basic calculation of individual victory in life. All children ought to have access to free tutoring, and higher instruction ought to be either free or reasonable for those seeking a college degree. In a society without free tutoring or reasonable higher instruction, as it were, children and youthful grown-ups from wealthier families would have to get to the most excellent learning openings and be superior to the work showcase. This kind of disparity would guarantee the victory of a few but hurt the prospects of others.

I argue that breaking even with rights and openings doesn't strife with people's flexibility to succeed or come up short. In other words, balance does not cruel individuals to lose their inspiration to succeed or are not permitted to come up short. On the opposite, most individuals would feel more spurred to work difficult and reach their potential in the event that they thought that they lived in a reasonable society. Those who did not make the same exertion would know they had squandered their opportunity. On the other hand, disparity would be more likely to demotivate individuals since they would know that the chances of victory were stacked in favor of favored foundations.

In conclusion, there's a positive relationship between balance and individual victory.

Check – IELTS Writing Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Comments

No comments to show