Governments Should Not Spend Money on International Aids IELTS Writing Task 2

Dec 23, 2022

Governments Should Not Spend Money on International Aids IELTS Writing Task 2 is an advantage-disadvantage essay. The three sample answers have been provided below. In this IELTS writing task 2, answers begin with identifying both views and are followed by a brief explanation related to the topic. The sample answers include 3 parts: introduction, body and conclusion. The introduction talks about the opinion and the reason behind it. The body explains and highlights points to support the topic. The conclusion will have the opinion of the candidate.

IELTS Writing Task 2 provides candidates an opportunity to express their knowledge and views based on the topic. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Since the topics are very diverse, candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a lot of topics.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: Some people think that governments should not spend money on international aids if there are disadvantaged people like the unemployed and homeless in their own country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Band 7 IELTS Essay

International assistance is a voluntarily given resource transfer from one nation to another. I firmly think that every country should support other nations who are desperately trying to rebuild their economies. Certainly, both developing and wealthy nations must assist disadvantaged individuals residing in developing nations.

My first argument is that there won't be any humanitarian help if unemployment and homelessness are used as grounds for denial of aid. Homelessness and unemployment are problems in even the most affluent nations, such as the United States and the United Kingdom.

The world's underprivileged will have no one to turn to if such nations stop providing help. For instance, records from 2013 show that more than 6% of Americans were unemployed, although the US helped out with $30 billion. Even developing countries like India have budgeted a percentage of their annual spending for international assistance. The bigger picture is what matters most. Other nations must be lifted up in order for one nation to advance.

Second, the majority of aid has indirect advantages for the giving country, such as enabling resource extraction or opening up new economic opportunities for the receiving nation. Multinational businesses (MNCs), for instance, who have opened offices in India as a consequence of foreign aid, surely employ many young people, but they pay them significantly less than what they must pay their own country's workers. India is a significant commercial market due to its expanding population, and many foreign companies have established retail outlets there. Giving and receiving countries both benefit from assistance, therefore it is a win-win situation.

In addition, every country should offer its assistance in the case of an emergency or a natural disaster like an earthquake or a tsunami. Aid does not always take the form of money; it can also be provided in the form of goods that the afflicted people need or by the donation of unpaid labour. Such help needs to be given, even if there are problems within the nation. Additionally, this improves international relations.

In conclusion, I think that all nations should contribute by giving aid internationally, even if they are struggling with unemployment and homelessness.

Band 6.5 IELTS Essay

Over the last 100 years, the population has grown exponentially, especially in developing and underdeveloped countries. Population growth, also brings about poverty, hunger, illiteracy, and unemployment. A lot of governments do allocate resources to handle such issues. However, it is bound to be insufficient for countries like India which house a billion people. Since the government does have its hands full, I wholeheartedly agree with the statement that they must prioritize their nationals first.

I can think of multiple reasons why our country should think about the welfare of its people before reaching out to help other countries. To begin with, our country’s financial resources are depleting alarmingly. We are already in quite a bit of debt. However, there are funds that are kept for humanitarian reasons and these must be used for developing and maintaining our own country. This can be used for providing shelter for the homeless, solving hunger, and educating the millions who still don’t have access to proper schooling. It can also be used to build our healthcare which has been under tremendous pressure over the last two years. Secondly, the resources can be used to bring about welfare schemes for those who are below the poverty line. It can help create jobs for people and thus reduce unemployment. This in turn facilitates economic growth thus alleviating our country.

I understand that it is reasonable to donate money to countries that have much less than what we have. This is purely on the basis of humanitarian grounds. No nation, ultimately, can survive without the support of other countries. Our world is on its way to globalization and becoming a world without borders. Financial assistance can reduce illegal immigration. I still staunchly believe that our government must provide support to their country before lending a hand to another country. It is true- charity does begin at home. We can only help when we can solve the issues that exist in our country. We must have sufficient resources and a surplus of funds in order to support others.

Finally, there are clear long-term advantages for the government in contributing money as humanitarian help to numerous other nations. But, before starting on humanitarian assistance overseas, the government must first enhance the economic, financial, and job prospects of its own citizens for their country to be better.

Band 6 IELTS Essay

Globalization strengthens the bonds that bind countries together. It is also giving way to making our world a borderless global village. Every country nowadays is looking for resources to help them prosper economically. These nations' governments exploit these resources to generate revenue in order to advance and give foreign help to people in need. However, some individuals are offended by the government's conduct in their country. I disagree with this assertion and will give evidence to back it up.

To begin with, I feel that offering foreign aid would benefit the country since it will enhance its relationship with other nations and open numerous doors. It would help improve diplomatic ties with other countries and help improve a country’s dependability. For example, if the richest country offers health and education facilities to the poorest country, the latter will be able to hire more people to work in that country, therefore resolving its unemployment problem. Furthermore, working in these areas may enhance the impoverished country's resources, opening up more opportunities in these fields. In addition, establishing industries in other countries will yield a two-way benefit. Telecommunications sectors, for example, help both giving and receiving countries. Second, offering aid in natural disasters such as earthquakes and floods is what we refer to as humanity. For the sake of humanity, each country should have its own foreign assistance account. This will aid the country's quick recovery. In exchange for providing aid and assistance to poor countries, developed countries receive a part of the resources available to them. For example, the United States owns interests in Middle Eastern oil corporations.

Finally, I believe that international subsidies will be beneficial in reducing poverty, unemployment, and homelessness in their own country rather than creating it. It ultimately provides support to all.

Read More IELTS Writing Related Samples