Government Should Be Responsible For Taking Care Of The Disadvantaged Members Of The Society IELTS Writing Task 2

The first argument in favor of the issue is that it is the government's duty to care for its people. The number of unemployed people has increased recently as a result of technological advancements like the development of computers. And other industrial equipment, which have allowed machines to take over human employment. Therefore, in order to preserve employment levels and individual jobs, the government should restrict the use of modern machines. For instance, India recently restricted China applications and refused to use China products. It has a significant influence on the staff members of Chinese enterprises. As a result, the nation now has a duty to give jobs to those without any other means of support.

Another thing to think about is that the government needs to take care of those without a place to live. The absence of work contributes to poverty, which makes it difficult for young people to meet their basic necessities. As a result, they get sidetracked from their goals and turn to unlawful means of obtaining what they want, which raises the crime rate. Therefore, the government should give young people work so they can earn money, live healthy lives. And develop into decent citizens in order to lessen these unlawful activities. For instance, industrialized nations always prioritize providing jobs and other amenities for their inhabitants.

To sum up, the administration should implement any laws by taking into account how they will affect specific people. As well as by giving the younger generation work to ensure a bright future for them and housing to those who are less fortunate.

The state, whose job it is to provide for its citizens, must realize that while the poor and homeless are not cared for by anyone. They are an essential part of any bucolic's development. All nations, developed or emerging, rely heavily on their agricultural sectors to grow their economies and prosper internationally. Because both men and women, and especially the poor, can engage in and contribute to the GDP (gross national product) of the rural area. The authority must employ more people in the agricultural sector.

Additionally, the law must take into account the fact that the homeless. Also those who are agrarians and work for the provincial government, must be provided with the necessities of life, such as housing, clothing, and water. Even international human rights organizations and committees today are unable to meet the needs and demands of the poor and needy. Every country's politics must therefore handle the situation flawlessly because they were chosen to help the people with their issues and challenges.

In drawing a conclusion there are a few key points that just need to be paid attention. It is important to keep in mind that a country's GDP growth is directly correlated with the number of people employed throughout all economic sectors. As a result, the government must take the necessary steps to assist the poor so that they may gain employment in a variety of fields.

There are numerous factors that support my position. The nation's citizens elect the government in the first place. It must therefore meet the needs of every member of society. More importantly, the government must make more efforts to raise the standard of living for the poor and needy. In truth, every government in the world aspires to a society that is equitable. And this ideal can only be realized if the government accepts responsibility for providing jobs. And shelter for those who are unemployed and homeless, respectively.

In the same vein, the government must assume responsibility for health. And education of the most disadvantaged members of society in addition to providing work and shelter. Increasing their level of education and providing them with quality healthcare will undoubtedly enhance the nation's economic situation in the near future. However, a few others express concern about the financial strain on the nation if the government sets aside money for the poor. It is, in my opinion, a limited perspective because, when given jobs, the unemployed join the labor and eventually increase output.

In conclusion, it is crucial to blur the distinctions between inequality even though helping the homeless and unemployed puts strain on the economies. I truly believe that the government must act to improve the living conditions of the poor for all of these fundamental reasons.