Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity IELTS Writing Task 2 is an essay topic that has 3 sample answers. The topic of the IELTS Writing Task 2 discusses the topic “Some people believe that the Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity”. The candidate has to talk about both views. So, to support the point, proper sentence structure, a grammatically correct approach, and reasonable explanations are necessary.
IELTS Writing Task 2 includes an introduction, body, & conclusion to assist applicants in achieving a good score in the writing section. Candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a wide range of theme because topics like Some people believe that the Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity IELTS Writing Task 2 are broad.
Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now
Topic:
Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Band 8 IELTS Essay
Society would pay to a few organizations for those who require offer assistance. These charities are willing to participate with characteristic assets, Healing centers and numerous more. I likely won't take part in this, because they don't have clearance with the open and it is difficult to believe how they battle.
Firstly, we pay charges to the government to extend the effectiveness of the country's assets. In expansion, a few nation banks grant the open a little expense credit. In spite of the fact that everybody tends to have these advances, related companies and organizations might gain these too. However, this may well be a conclusion but we don't know what precisely gift does. This can be an address for the citizenry as to why we ought to have a charity. As a result, this may lead us to cash washing. for illustration, they can make a fake calculation for their costs and get cash from obscure payers.
On the other hand, they can do numerous things for the clarity of their work and make something that they included be superior such as destitution, wildernesses and numerous more. Charity might bring a few benefits to individuals and keep the weight down on the governments to do their work superior and more effectively since they may have open bolster and everybody needs to coordinate with this volunteer exertion.
In conclusion, it is by and large acknowledged that gift can take pressure from administration organizations, whereas they tend to clear the way they work so well.
Band 7.5 IELTS Essay
Supporting charity could be a Compassionate activity which is prescribed to everybody in all social orders. Moreover, a few individuals accept that everyone must spend a portion of their pay to assist charities. Be that as it may, it appears it is somehow mandatory for individuals to deliver their money on something they don't need to indeed in case it could be a great deed. The exposition will deliver a few reasons for this claim.
The driving contradiction with donating a parcel of compensation to charities is since each individual does not have a rise to wage such as the distinction within the income between a specialist and a businessman so it isn't attainable to ask all individuals to grant a fixed portion of their pay rates to assist charities. For instance, a few laborers have agonizing challenges with their everyday living costs and it isn't prudent for them to assist others month to month. Additionally, a few individuals might need to spare a parcel of their compensation for their retirement to have a secure life without any offer of assistance. In case they spend their cash on charity by constraint, they will be defenseless within the future.
On the other hand, in case everyone contributed a settled sum of their costs towards charity, it could make strides in the lives of individuals living in destitution. In any case, magnanimity cannot be constrained; it depends on their readiness and profit. Indeed in spite of the fact that making a difference the charity may be an extraordinary thing to do and most of us may back these organs by our own will, making it a run the show might demolish numerous people's lives.
In conclusion, supporting charities may be a nice thing to do but driving all the individuals at distinctive levels of society isn't reasonable as some of them have problems matching their salary with their living needs or the other ones don't spend their cash to offer assistance to the charity due to sparing cash for their future.
Band 7 IELTS Essay
It is as often as possible energized that people give a foreordained sum of their compensation to charity. In any case, this articulation appears unsustainable since sympathy and humankind cannot be constrained.
Firstly, most people require steady and adequate income to bolster their well-being. Within the case that governments set up a certain sum or extent of the paycheck to be utilized for charity, individuals appear to get less pay than normal. Due to this circumstance, the welfare of society shows up to be declining. For instance, in a theoretical case where the specialist sets the charity expense as 5% of their month to month compensation and the least wage in that state is 3 million rupiahs, it implies that a person has to give 150 thousand rupiahs, which tends to be critical for a few individuals. A moment issue is the ethical issue. Social work is considered to require truthfulness. On the off chance that somebody did not truly give their cash, the gift would not have a critical ethical affect on society. By this, we are cruel that a social activity ought to come from their possess eagerness.
Whereas it may be redressed that this approach has a few positive angles, most eminently expanding open mindfulness with respect to the significance of compassionate financing and change in a few segments, such as the environment. It still shows up to be the case, be that as it may, that for numerous people, these benefits are exceeded by money related and ethical issues emerging from this idea.
In summary, the open isn't able to be constrained to perform helpful activities, primarily ones related to reserves, since they tend to prioritize their own needs and the viewpoint that on the off chance that this kind of thing is being constrained, there would be no ethical kindness from this activity. This can be not to say that this thought is drivel, but it shows up to be difficult to implement these days.
Check – IELTS Writing Samples
Comments