Ethical Issues Concerning The Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster Reading Answers

Sayantani Barman

Apr 4, 2024

Ethical Issues Concerning The Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster Reading Answers is an academic reading answers topic. Ethical Issues Concerning The Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster Reading Answers have a total of 12 IELTS questions in total. In the first 3 questions, you have to choose an appropriate choice given in the question. In the next 4 questions you have to say whether the statement is true or not. In the next 5 questions you have to fill in the blanks. 

Candidates should read the IELTS Reading passage thoroughly to recognize synonyms, identify keywords, and answer the questions below. IELTS Reading practice papers, which feature topics such as Ethical Issues Concerning The Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster Reading Answers. Candidates can use IELTS reading practice questions and answers to enhance their performance in the reading section.

CheckGet 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Section 1

Read the Text Below and Answer Questions

Ethical Issues Concerning The Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster

A Catastrophic Nuclear accident, the Chernobyl disaster, a level 7 nuclear accident on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES), occurred in the Number 4 light water graphite moderated reactor at theChernobyl Nuclear Power Plant nearPripyat, on 26 April 1986. At that time, this area belonged to theUkrainian Soviet Socialist Republic of theSoviet Union (USSR).

This horrific meltdown has rendered many regions of Ukraine dangerously radioactive, leading to rising cancer rates and straight deaths. The severity of the disaster was a strong blow for the Soviet Government and, since this incident, the global perceptions about nuclear power have changed drastically. The reason for the occurrence was many failures including faults in the reactor design, and poorly informed employees.

The major factors that led to the Chernobyl accident were the operation of the reactor at irregular intervals, violation of operating regulations and positive void coefficient characteristic of the reactor, which is a number used to get an estimate of the amount of reactivity of a nuclear reactor that changes along with the voids (typically steam bubbles) forming in the reactor moderator or coolant. In addition, perceptible lack of knowledge in the station staff regarding the characteristics and working of the reactor, substandard control rod design and inadequate monitoring were equally responsible. On the whole, it was the absence of the 'safety culture' that resulted in the disaster.

More than 30 people were killed at the place of the accident because of the radiation levels in the surrounding 20-mile radius, and nearly 1,35,000 people were evacuated. The consequences of this accident are being felt even today among which serious medical conditions such as cancer, breathing problems, skin diseases are just a few. Six people per million suffered from cancer before the accident had happened. But the statistics from 1986 - 1997 showed a rise to 45 cases per million.

As per the information in possession of the KGB of the USSR, design aberrations and violations of construction norms had occurred at various places in the structure. The pillars in the generator room were erected with a deviation of up to 100mm from the reference axis, and the horizontal connections were missing. Also, there was an

irregularity of up to 150 mm in the wall panels. Even the waterproofing was damaged in many places, and the Deputy Head of the Construction Directorate had ordered to backfill the foundation in those places. The damage could have led to groundwater seepage into the station, and consequently, radioactive contamination of the environment. The necessary attention was not paid to the foundation, and the cement plant operated erratically with a poor output. There were gaps during the laying of the foundation due to inconsistency while pouring cement.

The accident took place while performing an experiment. It was not under the normal

regime of operation, and no usual rules applied. Many safety procedures were also being violated as only 6 rods were in function whereas minimum 30 rods had to be used to control the fission of Uranium in the reactor. For the conduction of the test, the reactor should have had a power of 1000 MW but, because of operational error, the power dropped to 30 MW.

The engineers believed that they were fully aware of what was going on. 

Unfortunately, their judgement was utterly wrong! There was a lack of proper communication between the team in-charge and the personnel responsible for the operation of the nuclear reactor. The reactor became very unstable because of an increase in the coolant flow and a fall in the steam pressure following which, a sudden increase in temperature made the fuel explode as they completely lost control over the reactor.

The company was negligent towards its basic duty as no accurate and timely information on possible hazards to the people in the vicinity was provided although the public has a right to such information. People in the leading roles and the sub-staff were not technically trained, and the workers were not even given safety equipment. This holocaust was bound to happen! With there being such grave structural misapprehensions, it seems that the conditions were perfect.

For a nation as large as the then superpower, the USSR, the response to the disaster was not adequately handled, caused primarily due to a combination of a deficiency of foresight to have accurate radiation detection available to rescue crews in the vicinity and, shockingly, the government's reluctance to admit the gravity of the situation. The whole episode was a tightly knit web of unethical decisions which were taken before, during and after the Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Explosion.

Section 2

Solution and Explanation 

Questions 1-3

Write THREE correct letters ( A - F).

Which THREE of the following are mentioned in the passage in the context of the Chernobyl Nuclear Reactor Explosion?

  1. errors in the operation of the reactor
  2. well-defined dimensions in design
  3. inaccuracy in measurements of several parts while still under construction
  4. likelihood of impurities to prevail through moisture
  5. inadequate knowledge of safety measures
  6. experts worked in conjunction with the team members

Ques 1:

Answer: A
Supporting statement:
“........The major factors that led to the Chernobyl accident were the operation of the reactor at irregular intervals, violation of operating regulations and positive void ...........”
Keywords:
operation, positive 
Keyword Location: para 3, line 2
Explanation:
The passage discusses how irregular intervals in operating the reactor were one of the major factors leading to the Chernobyl accident.

Ques 2:

Answer: C
Supporting statement:
“.........As per the information in possession of the KGB of the USSR, design aberrations and violations of construction norms had occurred at various places in the structure. ..........”
Keywords:
aberrations, structure
Keyword Location: para 6, line 2
Explanation:
According to the passage, design aberrations and violations of construction norms occurred during the construction of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, leading to structural issues.

Ques 3:

Answer: D
Supporting statement:
“......... The damage could have led to groundwater seepage into the station, and consequently, radioactive contamination of the ..........”
Keywords:
station, radioactive 
Keyword Location: para 6, line 7
Explanation:
The passage mentions the possibility of groundwater seepage into the station due to damaged waterproofing, which could lead to radioactive contamination of the environment.

Questions 4-7
Choose
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information given in the passage,
Choose FALSE if the statement contradicts the information,
Or choose NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this.

  1. In spite of the necessary safety supplies, the staff failed to avail it.

Answer: FALSE
Supporting statement:
“........People in the leading roles and the sub-staff were not technically trained, and the workers were not even given safety ...........”
Keywords:
trained, workers 
Keyword Location: para 8, line 4
Explanation:
This statement is false because the passage indicates that workers were not given safety equipment, suggesting that it wasn't available to them.

  1. Since its inception stage, dangers of the reactor had been envisaged.

Answer: FALSE
Supporting statement:
“........Catastrophic Nuclear accident, the Chernobyl disaster, a level 7 nuclear accident on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES), occurred in the Number 4 light ..........”
Keywords:
nuclear, Event 
Keyword Location: para A, line 1
Explanation:
This statement is false. While the passage discusses the Chernobyl event and its causes, it doesn't suggest that dangers were foreseen since the inception stage.

  1. Large countries or superpowers are distinguished by their handling of adverse situations.

Answer: TRUE
Supporting statement:
“.........For a nation as large as the then superpower, the USSR, the response to the disaster was not adequately handled, caused primarily due to a combination of a ..........”
Keywords:
response, handled
Keyword Location: para 9, line 1
Explanation:
The passage discusses how the response to the Chernobyl disaster by the USSR, a superpower at the time, was not adequately handled.

  1. The Chernobyl event is the most significant example of amoral behaviour by powerful states.

Answer: NOT GIVEN
Explanation:
The passage doesn't directly discuss the Chernobyl event as an example of amoral behaviour by powerful states.

Questions 8-12

Write NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS AND/OR A NUMBER from the passage in each gap.

A large part of 8._ is still exposed to radiation, decades after the Chernobyl nuclear disaster that took place in 1986. With the explosion, radiation spread up to a 9 __in the vicinity. While 30 people died on the spot, more than a hundred thousands 10____ As per records, over a ten-year span following the disaster, there was a drastic rise in the cases of 11 __ and people are still suffering from respiratory and 12 ___ Problems. 

Q.8

Answer: UKRAINE 
Supporting statement:
“.........This horrific meltdown has rendered many regions of Ukraine dangerously radioactive, leading to rising cancer rates and straight deaths. The severity of the ..........”
Keywords:
radioactive, severity 
Keyword Location: para 2, line 1
Explanation:
Because the passage mentions that the Chernobyl disaster occurred in Ukraine, rendering many regions dangerously radioactive.

Q.9

Answer: 20 MILE RADIUS 
Supporting statement:
“..........More than 30 people were killed at the place of the accident because of the radiation levels in the surrounding 20-mile radius, and nearly 1,35,000 people were evacuated. The consequences
of this accident are being felt even today .........”
Keywords:
accident, consequences 
Keyword Location: para 4, line 1
Explanation:
The passage states that the radiation levels were high within a 20-mile radius of the accident site.

Q.10

Answer: WERE EVACUATED 
Supporting statement:
“........More than 30 people were killed at the place of the accident because of the radiation levels in the surrounding 20-mile radius, and nearly 1,35,000 people were evacuated...........”
Keywords:
radiation, evacuated
Keyword Location: para 4, line 1
Explanation:
The passage mentions that nearly 135,000 people were evacuated from the affected areas.

Q.11

Answer: CANCER
Supporting statement:
“..........The consequences of this accident are being felt even today among serious medical conditions such as cancer, breathing problems, skin diseases .........”
Keywords:
serious, diseases 
Keyword Location: para 4, line 3
Explanation:
The passage discusses a rise in cancer cases following the Chernobyl disaster.

Q.12

Answer: SKIN
Supporting statement:
“.........The consequences of this accident are being felt even today among which serious medical conditions such as cancer, breathing problems, skin diseases are just a few..........”
Keywords:
medical, diseases 
Keyword Location: para 4, line 3
Explanation:
The passage mentions skin diseases as one of the serious medical conditions resulting from the disaster.

Read More IELTS Reading Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Comments

No comments to show