IELTS Writing Task 1 is designed to evaluate a candidate's ability to interpret and summarize visual data, such as charts, graphs, and tables. The task requires identifying key trends, making comparisons, and presenting the information in a well-organized and coherent manner. Effective writing should emphasize the main features, avoid unnecessary details, and use clear, accurate vocabulary.
Engaging with IELTS Writing practice papers allows candidates to improve their skills in analyzing and summarizing various data formats. For the data showing electricity generation in Germany and France from all sources and renewable energy in 2009, the focus should be on comparing the total electricity output and the proportion contributed by renewables in each country. Regular practice enhances the ability to highlight significant trends, draw relevant comparisons, and structure the response effectively, which is essential for achieving a higher score in the IELTS writing section.
Topic:
The electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.
Band 8 IELTS Answer
The pie charts give data approximately the source of power in two nations in 2009. Generally, the utilization of renewable sources was still exceptionally high in Germany and France, whereas the different sorts of renewable vitality had diverse rates in both nations.
To start with, ordinary thermal utilization in Germany was higher than in France, with a difference of about a half percent. So also, the sum of renewable sources was higher in Germany. Be that as it may, atomic vitality was the largest asset in France, bookkeeping for three in four of the extents.
Renewable vitality from wind and biomass in Germany had nearly broken even with offers. Moreover, in France, the distinction was 2.4%. Most of the power was produced by hydroelectricity in France, while in Germany it accounted for 17.7%. In any case, sun power was the slightest utilized to create power in both nations. There was not any geothermal utilization either in Germany or France.
Band 7.5 IELTS Answer
The pie charts compare the source rate of power generated between Germany and France in 2009. In general, Hydroelectric and Atomic generated the most noteworthy rates of power, whereas the rate of power generated by others was least within the given year.
In terms of power, the rate of German power expanded from France power renewable source of Hydroelectric, from 17.7℅ to 80.5℅ within the year of 2009. Within the same years, In France, Atomic was expanded 76.0℅ which was the highest than German within the given year. So also, Tradition thermal was highest in Germany, which was diminished in France, expanding from 59.6℅ to 10.3℅.
For the remaining sources, In Germany, Renewable sources of Biomass expanded from France, from 39.3℅ to 8.1% within the year 2009. On the other hand, Renewable sources of sun oriented And Geoth. were the as it were sources which diminished in France from German within the year of 2009 to. In Germany source of wind was tall from France, from 6.1% to 0.0% And 0.0% to 0.0℅ individually
Band 7 IELTS Answer
These pie charts compare the source of the electrical era in France and Germany in 2009. centering on all sorts of vitality and renewables. Generally, it is obvious that routine thermal vitality was the prevailing source in Germany, whereas France for the most part depended on atomic control. Be that as it may, in terms of renewable sources, biomass is basically utilized by Germany, though France intensely utilizes hydroelectric control.
In 2009, Germany produced 59.6% of its power from routine thermal sources, followed by 23% from atomic vitality. Renewable sources with 17.4 % with biomass bookkeeping for the biggest extent at 80.5%, taken after by wind at 36.9% and hydroelectric at 17.7%. Sun-based vitality and geothermal played a minor part with 6.1% and 0.0%, separately.
To differentiate, France depended primarily on atomic control, which accounted for 76% of its power generation. Renewable vitality source made up 13.7% and routine thermal source contributed to 10.3%. In terms of renewables, hydroelectric was overwhelming at 80.5%, whereas wind and biomass bookkeeping for 10.5% and 8.1%, individually. Comparable to Germany, sun-powered and geothermal vitality were the slightest critical, at 0.9% and 0.0%.
In conclusion, ordinary thermal and atomic vitality overwhelmed the power era in Germany and France, separately, with biomass and hydroelectric being the foremost utilized renewable sources in each nation. Sun oriented and geothermal remained unimportant in both nations.
Comments