Common Educational System of Teachers and Students in a Classroom will be Replaced by the Year 2050 IELTS Writing Task 2

Technology will be the driving force behind education, and learning will be possible anywhere, anytime. Additionally, students will have a choice in how they acquire the necessary knowledge. Individual needs and interests will determine how people learn. The "one size fits all" method won't be used anymore. The materials that students can use to broaden their learning will be made available to them through the use of technology. Because information is always changing and being added to, teachers will no longer be the only experts but rather knowledge facilitators. For instance, the amount of medical knowledge doubles every eight years. And it's been estimated that by the time an engineering student graduates, half of what they learned in their first year would have been updated or amended. The teacher will continue to direct the kids' learning. However, with technology able to uncover more information than can be learnt, it will be difficult for teachers to have all the knowledge. The teacher will still be required to guide pupils in finding information and to assist them in assessing the reliability of websites and other sources. To continually improve the learning environment for pupils, technology experts must be a part of the educational system. Textbooks won't be used because every youngster will have a mobile computer. Teachers will use tablet computers and projectors to instantly access visuals at the front of the classroom. With the hum of desktop computers taking the place of the previous sound of chalk on a blackboard. In conclusion, I would want to state that in 2050, despite all the new technology. Even if teachers used technology to convey knowledge, school would still be a social setting and teachers would still be there.

First off, because of the expansion of science's theoretical underpinnings, breakthroughs are becoming more common in modern contexts. There are therefore many benefits that demonstrate the need to overhaul the current educational system. The primary cause is new technological advancements. Because the current decade has advanced too far. Online lessons become the students' top preference under this standard. Because it will become a convenient way to learn academic material. As a result, thanks to video conferences that may be quickly recorded, they are once again able to attend classes. Moreover, they are better able to complete their lecture-related obligations and clear up any topic-related questions. Comfort zone preference is still another element. because instead of meeting in a classroom, a small group of instructors and pupils video conference in person. As a result, they learn comfortably at home rather than making a long commute to school. Additionally, students get additional knowledge and information about their courses. They study about their subjects in full detail because there are so many websites available. As a result, this improves their capacity for information. In contrast, despite the fact that technological advancements have led to the development of education and the replacement of classrooms. However, this idea has a few flaws that give it a bad reputation. Less communication between students and teachers is the main cause. Because they cannot maintain their social skills when they do not connect with teachers and other students, this has a negative effect on their mental health. Because students start to rely solely on internet access for their schoolwork. They consequently become distracted by their surroundings, which has a detrimental effect on their development and physical and mental health. To sum up, I believe that, despite the abundance of positive characteristics, the educational system will continue to improve over the coming decades. However, this also paints a picture of a few disadvantages with regard to this criterion. Such as decreased interaction with the environment and a negative influence on health.

These modifications to the learning process have raised concerns about the potential loss of teachers' significance in the classroom. Certain people think that the decline in the importance of instructors can be attributed to the fact that some pupils are making academic progress more quickly. This is due to computers more than they would have in a traditional classroom. For instance, pupils with various intellectual levels in the same classroom would cause some to make slower academic progress. Mainly due to the inability of others to grasp. In this method, rather than studying from teachers, students might advance in their knowledge acquisition at their own pace utilising computers. However, pupils need teachers to be present since human interaction has a favourable impact on them. Students first understand that they are interacting with a human being who is deserving of their respect and attention rather than a computer. Additionally, they learn the value of group study and how to respect other kids, which aids in the development of their social skills. Furthermore, teachers are essential to the learning process. Because they recognize the weaknesses of some students and assist them in resolving those issues by repeating explanations. And sometimes also by providing extra practice, or even proposing a private tutor. As a result, pupils may have a better probability of passing a topic. In conclusion, I believe that teachers' roles will change but that they cannot be completely eliminated. Students need the supervision and direction of a skilled teacher in order to learn successfully and efficiently. The role of a teacher is crucial, especially at the elementary school level where pupils require more guidance from educators. In the educational field, assistance and guidance without teachers are not only challenging but also impossible.