Developed Nations Have a Greater Responsibility to Tackle Climate Change IELTS Writing Task 2

To start, since all nations are equally responsible for causing climate change. Everyone must work together to solve this issue's primary cause—human dependence on fossil fuels. The government won't begin considering potential measures to end this issue at the national level until every nation is held accountable. Additionally, the government can create solutions that are most beneficial to its citizens because it is aware of the particular circumstances of each nation.

In general, there are two basic justifications for why people think every nation must do its part to stop climate change. People may support this proposal primarily because only a small number of participating nations can effectively solve the issue of climate change. This is due to the fact that it is a planetary issue. Therefore, any remedy to it must also be applied globally. The fact that developing nations lack the resources. And technology that industrialized nations do to address environmental issues is another reason in support of it. Therefore, each nation should be accountable.

Despite these objections, there is evidence supporting the notion that industrialized nations have a greater obligation to tackle climate change. The primary reason industrialized nations are held responsible for environmental contamination is their ability to industrialize. Allowed them to grow at the expense of environmental issues. Additionally, they have an obligation to lead by example. Therefore enacting policy changes will inspire other countries to follow suit. If developing nations are concerned about environmental pollution.

In conclusion, this is a subject that is pertinent to contemporary culture. In my opinion, all nations should share equally in the burden of solving environmental issues. If every country made an effort to address the global environmental issues, the outcomes would undoubtedly be better.

People typically hold that every nation has a responsibility to prevent humidity shifts for two main reasons. The fact that only a few participating countries can't handle the problem of temperature transition. May be the key factor influencing public opinion of this proposal. This is due to the fact that it is a planetary issue. Therefore, any remedy to it must also be applied globally. The fact that developing nations lack the resources and technology. That industrialized nations do to address environmental issues is another reason in support of it. Therefore, there should be power in every nation.

Despite these defenses, there is also evidence that industrialized nations exercise greater prudence in their efforts to prevent humidity modification. The primary reason industrialized nations are held responsible for environmental contamination. Their ability to industrialize allowed them to grow at the expense of environmental issues. Additionally, they have an obligation to lead by example, therefore enacting policy changes will inspire other countries to follow suit. Developing nations will exercise caution if environmental pollution is of concern to them. Additionally, these countries have more influence in international affairs and are well-aware of the different efficient technologies. That can slow down climate change as a result of their financial standing. By sharing knowledge and technology that can be useful to the emerging nations, these wealthy countries can undoubtedly aid and direct them.

In conclusion, this is a subject that is pertinent to contemporary culture. All things considered, I think that the burden of environmental issues should fall evenly on all nations. If every country made an effort to address the global environmental issues, the outcomes would undoubtedly be better.

Although it is true that industrialized countries have the resources, the threat of climate change is too great for a few wealthy nations to handle alone. This is hardly shocking given that a sizable portion of the world's population resides in developing nations. The need for petroleum in those countries will only rise as they develop. Additionally, they will produce more greenhouse gasses as they utilize more fuel. The claim that wealthy countries are responsible for combating climate change does not hold much water in this situation.

Conversely, developing countries require more energy to support their economic expansion. They will experience slower growth if they cut back on their fuel usage. Getting both rich and developing countries involved in the fight against environmental problems is a more practical solution. Developed nations may use their resources and scientific expertise to discover more environmentally friendly energy sources. Then, they can impart this information and technical know-how to emerging countries. Meanwhile, poorer nations should do their part by making significant investments in current green technologies. For instance, solar energy and wind energy are presently accessible everywhere. Governments in underdeveloped countries should provide subsidies to their citizens to encourage them to convert to these sources of energy. As an illustration, the Indian government recently provided a 20% tax credit for solar roofing. This is a positive development.

In conclusion, climate change is a serious issue that requires immediate attention. Both emerging and developed countries need to work together to resolve this issue. But if they work together, they can come up with a solution.