Climate Change and the Atlantic Reading Answers

Sayantani Barman

Jun 18, 2024

Climate change and the Atlantic Reading Answers is an academic reading answers topic. Climate Change and the Atlantic Reading Answers have a total of 8 IELTS questions in total. In the questions you have to choose which section mentions the correct information from the passage by selecting Yes, No, and Not Given and matching the sentences.

Candidates should read the IELTS Reading passage thoroughly to recognize synonyms, identify keywords, and answer the questions below. IELTS Reading practice papers, which feature topics such as Climate change and the Atlantic Reading Answers. Candidates can use IELTS reading practice questions and answers to enhance their performance in the reading section.

CheckGet 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Section 1

Read the Text Below and Answer Questions

Climate Change and the Atlantic

Are changes in ocean circulation about to turn our lives upside down, or is this something only our grandchildren will have to cope with? This vital question is in doubt because the behaviour of ocean currents is still remarkably obscure. On a crude level, the oceans of the world are linked together by a network of currents sometimes called the global conveyor, with warm surface flows connecting to cold deep currents. The conveyor is driven by winds and by a more complicated process called thermohaline circulation - and this is the process that has climatologists worried. As its name implies, thermohaline circulation depends on heat and salt. An offshoot of the Gulf Stream called the North Atlantic Drift flows all the way to the seas off Greenland and Norway. Evaporation makes the water saltier, so as it is chilled by Arctic winds it becomes denser than the waters underneath it and sinks. It then spills back southward over the undersea ledges between Greenland and Scotland to form a slow, cold, undersea river called the North Atlantic Deep Water. This flows all the way to the Southern Ocean, with some water going as far the Indian Ocean, where it gradually wells up again, perhaps a millennium after it sank.

The weak link is the sinking process. Climate change is injecting ever more fresh water into the Arctic by increasing river flows and accelerating the calving of icebergs from Greenland. This fresh water dilutes the North Atlantic Drift, reducing its density and making it more buoyant. If the fresh water input reaches a critical rate, around 100,000 tonnes per second, sinking could stop entirely. The northern branch of the conveyor would stop, and warm tropical waters would no longer flow past the west coast of Europe. With that million-gigawatt heat supply switched off, climate models suggest that air temperatures in the region could fall by between 5 and 10 °C, and parts of the US and Canada would suffer too. A switch-off like this is blamed for a cold snap 12,000 years ago called the Younger Dryas, which turned the forests of Scandinavia into tundra. Could it be happening again? That spectre was raised in December by Harry Bryden of the National Oceanography Centre in Southampton, UK.

His team took a ship from Florida to the coast of North Africa, stopping at 120 points en route to lower a bundle of instruments all the way to the sea floor. The researchers compared their results with similar measurements made at irregular intervals since 1957. According to their analysis, the deep, cold return leg of the circulation has weakened by 30 percent. If that has slowed, they reasoned, then the northward branch of warm water must have slowed too.

In fact, the slowdown seems to have started nearly a decade ago. When the US National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration made a similar survey of the Atlantic in 1998 it was interested in carbon dioxide levels and did not calculate the flow rate. When Bryden's team did the sums, they found the flow had been relatively steady between 1957 and 1992, dropped off by 1998 and remained low. Bryden's paper prompted some nervous press coverage. "There were alarming stories saying that the sky is falling," says Carl Wunsch, a physical oceanographer at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "It's a complicated story reduced to a fairytale". In fact, Bryden's measurements are not proof of imminent cataclysm.

One question mark is whether his team has simply seen short-term fluctuations in the ocean. "The ocean is a very turbulent beast. We tend to assume that at great depth it is quiet, but that's not necessarily so," says Stefan Rahmstorf of the University of Potsdam in Germany. Wunsch likens it to the vagaries of the weather: "It might get colder for a few days in England, but you don't necessarily say we're entering a new ice age." Bryden, however, thinks his team has found more than a stutter. "If we just had the 1998 data we'd be nervous, but 2004 is similar to 1998," he says.

There are other reasons to be cautious. Climate models do not predict any substantial slowdown in Atlantic currents until near the end of this century. "It would mean all our models are wrong," says Rahmstorf. Bryden thinks they might well be: "I think if we measure a slowdown, the models will follow." The trouble for Bryden is that not all observations fit in with his conclusions. If less warm water is flowing north, the seas off western Europe ought to be cooler than normal. They are not. In fact, these waters are slightly warmer than a decade ago. And direct measurements of the cold, deep currents that spill southwards over the ledges joining Scotland, Iceland and Greenland do not show a downward trend. Although these currents did slow between 1995 and 2000, they have picked up again. "We are faced with conflicting evidence," says Rahmstorf.

How to resolve this conflict? It is possible that Bryden's group has got its physics wrong. Like other groups, the team did not measure flow rates directly, but instead calculated them from measurements of temperature and salinity. Rahmstorf and Wunsch both point out that these calculations rely on assumptions that are far from proven. Alternatively, it could be that the currents are changing in ways that no one has anticipated. There is a vast stretch of ocean between Bryden's measurements at 25° north and the overspill at around 65°. In between, the warm surface current becomes meandering and unstable, and difficult to measure, says oceanographer Tore Furevik of the University of Bergen in Norway. "There are certainly large changes going on beneath the surface of the North Atlantic, but we are still missing too many pieces in the puzzle to get the picture clear," he says.

For the moment, this rather unsatisfactory answer is the best we have. Oceanographers and climate scientists agree that thermohaline circulation will slow as the world warms, but most think it will happen later rather than sooner. In its report due next year, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is likely to predict a slowdown of at most 50 percent by the end of this century.

Section 2

Solution and Explantion

Questions 27 - 34

Write Yes, No or Not Given.

  1. Climate specialists are predominantly worried about the affect of the wind on the network of ocean currents.

Answer: NO
Supporting statement:
“.........The conveyor is driven by winds and by a more complicated process called thermohaline circulation - and this is the process that has climatologists worried.........”
Keywords:
worried, thermohaline
Keyword Location: para 1, Line 4
Explanation:
The statement clarifies that climatologists are primarily concerned about thermohaline circulation, not the wind's impact on ocean currents.

  1. The North Atlantic Deep Water is formed from the Gulf Stream.

Answer: YES
Supporting statement:
“........An offshoot of the Gulf Stream called the North Atlantic Drift flows all the way to the seas off Greenland and Norway... and sinks. It then spills back southward... to form a slow, cold, undersea river called the North Atlantic Deep Water..........”
Keywords: Drift, North
Keyword Location: para 1, Lines 7-12 
Explanation:
The North Atlantic Deep Water is indeed formed from the Gulf Stream through the process described.

  1. Climate change is indirectly making the North Atlantic Drift lighter.

Answer: YES
Supporting statement:
“......Climate change is injecting ever more fresh water into the Arctic... This fresh water dilutes the North Atlantic Drift, reducing its density and making it more buoyant...........”
Keywords:
water, North
Keyword Location: para 2, Lines 1-5
Explanation:
The influx of fresh water from climate change makes the North Atlantic Drift less dense and more buoyant.

  1. Younger Dryas was caused by a warming of tropical waters off the west coast of Europe.

Answer: NO
Supporting statement:
“.........A switch-off like this is blamed for a cold snap 12,000 years ago called the Younger Dryas, which turned the forests of Scandinavia into tundra........”
Keywords:
Dryas, cold
Keyword Location: para 2, Lines 9-10 
Explanation:
Younger Dryas was caused by a cold snap, not by the warming of tropical waters

  1. Some critics believe that Bryden's research does not cover a sufficiently long period of time.

Answer: YES
Supporting statement:
“.......One question mark is whether his team has simply seen short-term fluctuations in the ocean..........”
Keywords:
fluctuations, ocean
Keyword Location: para 6, Line 1
Explanation:
Critics are concerned that Bryden's data may reflect short-term fluctuations rather than long-term trends.

  1. Today, the seas around the west of Europe are moving more quickly than 10 years ago.

Answer: NOT GIVEN
Explanation:
The para does not provide information about the current movement speed of the seas around the west of Europe compared to 10 years ago.

  1. Bryden's data is based on changes in salt levels.

Answer: YES
Supporting statement:
“.........Like other groups, the team did not measure flow rates directly, but instead calculated them from measurements of temperature and salinity........”
Keywords:salinity, calculated
Keyword Location: para 9, Line 2
Explanation:
Bryden's team used salinity (or salt levels) and temperature to calculate flow rates.

  1. The conflicting evidence could be due to the difference between Bryden's and Furevik's measurement techniques.

Answer: NOT GIVEN 
Explanation:
The para does not directly discuss differences in measurement techniques between Bryden and Furevik.

Questions 35 - 40

Match each name to the sentences below.

  1. Rahmstorf
  2. Bryden
  3. Furevik
  4. Wunsch
  1. used data collected at uneven time periods

Answer: B
Supporting statement:
“........The researchers compared their results with similar measurements made at irregular intervals since 1957.........”
Keywords:
intervals, measurements
Keyword Location: para 3, Line 3
Explanation:
Bryden's team used data collected at irregular intervals over several decades. They compared recent results with historical data from as far back as 1957 to analyze changes in ocean currents, indicating uneven collection periods.

  1. believes that a lot more information needs to be gathered

Answer: C
Supporting statement:
“......There are certainly large changes going on beneath the surface of the North Atlantic, but we are still missing too many pieces in the puzzle to get the picture clear," he says...........”
Keywords:
pieces, puzzle
Keyword Location: para 9, Lines 6-7
Explanation:
Furevik emphasizes the need for more comprehensive data to understand the complex changes occurring in the North Atlantic. It indicates that current information is insufficient to form a complete picture.

  1. points out that deep oceans are quite unstable

Answer: A
Supporting statement:
“......The ocean is a very turbulent beast. We tend to assume that at great depth it is quiet, but that's not necessarily so," says Stefan Rahmstorf............”
Keywords:
beast, great
Keyword Location: para 6, Lines 3-4
Explanation:
Rahmstorf highlights the inherent instability and turbulence of deep ocean currents, challenging the common assumption that deeper ocean layers are more stable and less dynamic.

  1. compares Bryden's findings to changes in the weather

Answer: D
Supporting statement:
“..........Wunsch likens it to the vagaries of the weather: 'It might get colder for a few days in England, but you don't necessarily say we're entering a new ice age........”
Keywords:
weather, colder, ice
Keyword Location: para 6, Line 6
Explanation:
Wunsch compares the fluctuations observed in Bryden's ocean current data to short-term weather changes, suggesting that such variations do not necessarily indicate a long-term or catastrophic trend.

  1. relies on a degree of guesswork

Answer: B
Supporting statement:
“........Like other groups, the team did not measure flow rates directly, but instead calculated them from measurements of temperature and salinity.........”
Keywords:
calculated, temperature
Keyword Location: para 9, Line 2
Explanation:
Bryden's team used indirect calculations based on temperature and salinity measurements, involving assumptions that introduce a level of uncertainty and guesswork in determining flow rates.

  1. criticises the way Bryden's work was reported

Answer: D
Supporting statement:
“.......Bryden's paper prompted some nervous press coverage. 'There were alarming stories saying that the sky is falling,' says Carl Wunsch..........”
Keywords:
stories, sky
Keyword Location: para 5, Line 6 
Explanation:
Wunsch criticizes the sensational and alarmist media coverage of Bryden's findings, arguing that the reports exaggerated the potential implications without sufficient evidence.

Read More IELTS Reading Related Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Comments

No comments to show