Australia’s Lost Giants Reading Answers

Dec 13, 2022

Australia’s Lost Giants Reading Answers is a topic to discuss about the lost giants of Australia. The given IELTS topic has a total of 13 sets of questions which the candidates should answer within 20 minutes of the given time. The candidates should mandatorily go through the passage for understanding the core of the passage. The topic has a wide range of questions and is divided into four segments, mainly, Choose the correct paragraph, Choose the correct answer, Choose any two options, and True/False/Not Given. The candidates should thoroughly skim the IELTS reading passage in order to analyze the gist of the passage, recognize the synonyms and identify the keywords and then should attempt to answer the questions below. The candidates for the preparation of similar kinds of topics should practice the IELTS reading practice papers.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Section 1

Read the Passage to Answer the Following Questions

Australia’s Lost Giants Reading Answers

What happened to Australia's megafauna, the giant animals that once existed across this enormous continent?

In 1969, a fossil hunter named Rod Wells came to Naracoorte in South Australia to explore what was then known as Victoria Cave. Wells clawed through narrow passages, and eventually into a huge chamber. Its floor of red soil was littered with strange objects. It took Wells a moment to realize what he was looking at: the bones of thousands of creatures that must have fallen through holes in the ground above and become trapped. Some of the oldest belonged to mammals far larger than any found today in Australia. They were the ancient Australian megafauna - huge animals of the Pleistocene epoch. In boneyards across the continent, scientists have found the fossils of a giant snake, a huge flightless bird, and a seven foot kangaroo, to name but a few. Given how much ink has been spilled on the extinction of the dinosaurs, it's a wonder that even more hasn't been devoted to megafauna. Prehistoric humans never threw spears at Tyrannosaurus rex but really did hunt mammoths and mastodons.
The disappearance of megafauna in America - mammoths, saber-toothed cats, giant sloths, among others - happened relatively soon after the arrival of human beings, about 13,000 years ago. In the 1960s, paleoecologist Paul Martin developed what became known as the blitzkrieg hypothesis. Modern humans, Martin said, created havoc as they spread through the Americas, wielding spears to annihilate animals that had never faced a technological predator. But this period of extinction wasn't comprehensive. North America kept its deer, black bears and a small type of bison, and South America its jaguars and llamas.
What happened to Australia's large animals is baffling. For years scientists blamed the extinctions on climate change. Indeed, Australia has been drying out for over a million years, and the megafauna were faced with a continent where vegetation began to disappear. Australian paleontologist Tim Flannery suggests that people, who arrived on the continent around 50,000 years ago, used fire to hunt, which led to deforestation. Something dramatic happened to Australia's dominant land creatures - somewhere around 46,000 years ago, strikingly soon after the invasion of a tool-wielding, highly intelligent predator. In Flannery's 1994 book called The Future Eaters, he sets out his thesis that human beings are a new kind of animal on the planet, and are in general, one prone to ruining ecosystems. Flannery's book proved highly controversial. Some viewed it as critical of the Aborigines, who pride themselves on living in harmony with nature. The more basic problem with Flannery's thesis is that there is no direct evidence that they killed any Australian megafauna. It would be helpful if someone uncovered a Diprotodon skeleton with a spear point embedded in a rib - or perhaps Thylacoleo bones next to the charcoal of a human campfire. Such kill sites have been found in the Americas but not in Australia.
The debate about megafauna pivots to a great degree on the techniques for dating old bones and the sediments in which they are buried. If scientists can show that the megafauna died out fairly quickly and that this extinction event happened within a few hundred, or even a couple thousand years, of the arrival of people, that's a strong case - even if a purely circumstantial one - that the one thing was the direct result of the other. As it happens, there is one place where there may be such evidence: Cuddie Springs in New South Wales. Today the person most vocal about the site is archeologist Judith Field. In 1991, she discovered megafauna bones directly adjacent to stone tools - a headlinemaking find. She says there are two layers showing the association, one about 30,000 years old, the other 35,000 years old. If that dating is accurate, it would mean humans and megafauna coexisted in Australia for something like 20,000 years. "What Cuddie Springs demonstrates is that you have an extended overlap of humans and megafauna," Field says. Nonsense, say her critics. They say the fossils have been moved from their original resting places and redeposited in younger sediments.
Another famous boneyard in the same region is a place called Wellington Caves, where Diprotodon, the largest known marsupial - an animal which carries its young in a pouch like kangaroos and koalas - was first discovered. Scientist Mike Augee says that: "This is a sacred site in Australian paleontology." Here's why: In 1830 a local official named George Rankin lowered himself into the cave on a rope tied to a protrusion in the cave wall. The protrusion turned out to be a bone. A surveyor named Thomas Mitchell arrived later that year, explored the caves in the area, and shipped fossils off to Richard Owen, the British paleontologist who later gained fame for revealing the existence of dinosaurs. Owen recognized that the Wellington cave bones belonged to an extinct marsupial. Later, between 1909 and 1915 sediments in Mammoth Cave that contained fossils were hauled out and examined in a chaotic manner that no scientist today would approve. Still, one bone in particular has drawn extensive attention: a femur with a cut in it, possibly left there by a sharp tool.
Unfortunately, the Earth preserves its history haphazardly. Bones disintegrate, the land erodes, the climate changes, forests come and go, rivers change their course - and history, if not destroyed, is steadily concealed. By necessity, narratives are constructed from limited data. Australia's first people expressed themselves in rock art. Paleontologist Peter Murray has studied a rock painting in far northern Australia that shows what looks very much like a megafauna marsupial known as Palorchestes. In Western Australia another site shows what appears to be a hunter with either a marsupial lion or a Tasmanian tiger - a major distinction, since the marsupial lion went extinct and the much smaller Tasmanian tiger survived into the more recent historical era. But as Murray says, "Every step of the way involves interpretation. The data doesn't just speak for itself."

Section 2

Solution With Explanation

Questions 26-30

The text above has six paragraphs, A-F. Which paragraphs contain the following information? Every question has only one answer but you may use any of the letters A-F for more than one question. Circle the correct letters in your answer sheet.

descriptions of naturally occurring events that make the past hard to trace
an account of the discovery of a particular animal which had died out
the reason why a variety of animals all died in the same small area
the suggestion that a procedure to uncover fossilised secrets was inappropriate
examples of the kinds of animals that did not die out as a result of hunting

Question:

Answer: F
Supporting sentence: Bones disintegrate, the land erodes, the climate changes, forests come and go, rivers change their course - and history, if not destroyed, is steadily concealed.
Keywords: history, destroyed, concealed
Keyword location: Paragraph F, line 1
Explanation: The first sentence of paragraph F explains that the fragmentation of the bones, the corrosion of the land, changes in the climatic conditions, the uncertain courses of rivers, etc are the examples of such naturally occurred incidents making it difficult to identify the past.

Question:

Answer: E
Supporting sentence: Another famous boneyard in the same region is a place called Wellington Caves, where Diprotodon, the largest known marsupial - an animal which carries its young in a pouch like kangaroos and koalas - was first discovered.
Keywords: discovered, animal
Keyword location: Paragraph E, line 1
Explanation: The beginning sentence of paragraph E explains that Diprotodon, the largest known marsupial (an animal that holds its young in a pouch like kangaroos and koalas), was initially discovered in Wellington Caves, another well-known boneyard in the same area.

Question:

Answer: A
Supporting sentence: It took Wells a moment to realize what he was looking at: the bones of thousands of creatures that must have fallen through holes in the ground above and become trapped.
Keywords: bones, creatures, trapped
Keyword location: Paragraph A, line 4
Explanation: The fourth line of paragraph A explains that through the holes in the ground above, the bones of numerous extinct species had fallen. When they fell into the ground, they became imprisoned there. The earliest belonged to mammals that were much larger than those that are currently extant in Australia.

Question:

Answer: E
Supporting sentence: Later, between 1909 and 1915 sediments in Mammoth Cave that contained fossils were hauled out and examined in a chaotic manner that no scientist today would approve.
Keywords: fossils, hauled out, chaotic
Keyword location: paragraph E, line 7
Explanation: Line 7 of paragraph E states that the sediments containing fossils were later removed from Mammoth Cave between the year of1909 and 1915 and analysed in a disorganised manner that no scientist today would approve of.

Question:

Answer: B
Supporting sentence: North America kept its deer, black bears and a small type of bison, and South America its jaguars and llamas.
Keywords: extinction, comprehensive
Keyword location: paragraph B, line 4-5
Explanation: Lines 4-5 of paragraph B explains that species namely, deers, black bears of North America and llamas and jaguars of South America did not extinct due to the reason of their hunting.

Questions 31-32

For questions 31-32 choose the correct answer A, B or C. Circle the correct letter in your answer sheet.

Judith Field claims that

she made a great discovery in 1991.
she found fossil remains of giant animals in layers of sediments very close to those which had stone tools in them.
she was most vocal about Cuddie Springs in South New Wales as an important archeological site.

Question:

Answer: B
Supporting sentence: In 1991, she discovered megafauna bones directly adjacent to stone tools - a headline making kind.
Keywords: Judith Field, stone tools
Keyword Location: Paragraph D, line 4-5
Explanation: Lines 4-5 of paragraph D implies that the archeaologist Judith Field in the year of 1991 found the trace of megafauna bones, the sort that make headlines, right next to stone tools.

Judith Field's opponents claim that

the fossils of some younger animals were found in Cuddie Springs.
there was long co-existence of humans and megafauna.
the layers where fossils were found had been displaced

Question:

Answer: C
Supporting sentence: Nonsense, say her critics. They say the fossils have been moved from their original resting places and redeposited in younger sediments.
Keywords: critics, redeposited
Keyword Location: paragraph D, lines 9-10
Explanation: Lines 9-10 of paragraph D states that the rivals or critics of Judith Field termed her speculations to be an insensitive one, as according to them in order to be redeposited in more recent sediments, the fossils were transported from where they had previously been found.

Question 33

Which TWO of these possible reasons for Australian megafauna extinction are mentioned in the text? Choose TWO letters from A-E for question 33.

human activity
disease
loss of habitat
a drop in temperature
the introduction of new animal species

Answer: A, C
Keyword location: paragraph B line 3, paragraph C line 3
Keywords: human, annihilate, megafauna, disappear
Supporting sentence (A): Modern humans, Martin said, created havoc as they spread through the Americas, wielding spears to annihilate animals that had never faced a technological predator.
Supporting sentence (C): Indeed, Australia has been drying out for over a million years, and the megafauna were faced with a continent where vegetation began to disappear.
Explanation: According to Martin in the third line of paragraph B, using spears to slay creatures that had never encountered a technological predator, modern humans wreaked devastation as they swept across the Americas. Also the third line of paragraph C explains that Australia has actually been drying out for more than a million years, and the megafauna were forced to survive on a continent where the flora was starting to disappear. Therefore, option A as well as option C will be the right choice here.

Question 34

The list below shows possible forms of proof for humans having contact with Australian megafauna. Which TWO possible forms of proof does the writer say have been found in Australia? Choose TWO letters from A-E for question 34.

bone injury caused by a man-made object
bones near to early types of weapons
man-made holes designed for trapping animals
preserved images of megafauna species
animal remains at camp fires

Answer: A, D
Keyword Location: paragraph E line 8, paragraph F line 5
Keywords: bone, cut, rock painting
Supporting sentence (A): Still, one bone in particular has drawn extensive attention: a femur with a cut in it, possibly left there by a sharp tool.
Supporting sentence (D): Palaeontologist Peter Murray has studied a rock painting in far northern Australia that shows what looks very much like a megafauna marsupial known as Palorchestes.
Explanation: As per the eighth line of paragraph E, a femur with a cut in it, is a bone, possibly caused by a sharp tool, has attracted a lot of interest in particular. Again the fifth line of paragraph F implies that the megafauna mammal known as Palorchestes appears in a rock painting that palaeontologist Peter Murray investigated in far northern Australia. Therefore, option A and D will be the appropriate choice.

Questions 35-38

Do the following statements agree with the claims of the writer in the text?

Circle

(TRUE) if the statement agrees with the claims of the writer
(FALSE) if the statement contradicts the claims of the writer
(NOT GIVEN) if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this

There is sufficient evidence to support Tim Flannery's ideas about megafauna extinction.

Answer: TRUE.
Supporting sentence: Given how much ink has been spilled on the extinction of the dinosaurs, it’s a wonder that even more hasn’t been devoted to megafauna.
Keywords: extinction, dinosaurs, megafauna
Keyword Location: paragraph A, line 8
Explanation: The narrator in the line 8 of paragraph A states that greater awareness and attention should be given to the extinction of megafauna than has so far been given to the demise of the dinosaurs. So, the statement is TRUE.

Extinct megafauna should receive more attention than the extinction of the dinosaurs.

Answer: NOT GIVEN
Explanation: No suggested information regarding the above statement is provided in the above passage.

The Aborigines should have found a more effective way to protest about Flannery's book.

Answer: NOT GIVEN
Explanation: There is not any pertinent information found in the above context in order to justify this said statement.

There are problems with Paul Martin's 'blitzkrieg' hypothesis for the Americas.

Answer: B
Supporting sentence: In the 1960s, paleoecologist Paul Martin developed what became known as the blitzkrieg hypothesis
Keywords: 1960s, Paul Martin, blitzkrieg hypothesis.
Keyword Location: paragraph B, lines 2-3
Explanation: The narrator in lines 2-3 of paragraph B enhances that the blitzkrieg hypothesis as implemented by paleoecologist Paul Martin in the 1960s claimed that once modern humans invaded the Americas, they wreaked havoc by using spears to slay creatures that had never encountered a technical predator. Hence, the above statement is a FALSE one.

Read more IELTS Reading Samples