Australian Government’s Investments In Various Energy Sectors IELTS Writing Task 1

Australian Government’s Investments In Various Energy Sectors IELTS Writing Task 1 sample Answer is given below. The candidates are required to present a tentative answer for the same. IELTS writing task 1 requires candidates to write a summary or overview based on a diagram, a table, a line graph, or a bar graph in at least 150 words. IELTS academic writing task 1 is a writing task for 150 words. Candidates are given 20 minutes and are required to write a summary for IELTS Academic writing task 1. IELTS writing score is marked based on band scores. The band scores range from 0 to 9. Meanwhile, candidates might consider practising from IELTS writing practice papers to help excel your writing skills.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check:
Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: The Pie charts compare Australian government’s investments in various energy sectors and the share of electricity generated by those sectors.

image1

Band 7 Answer

The two graphs below show government spending in Australia's various energy sectors. It portrays a comparison of the percentage of power generated by each type of energy.

In terms of total investments, the Australian government placed the most money in the wind industry, then nuclear, and then in the other categories. In contrast, coal and solar energy sources came in second and third, respectively, with natural gas having the lowest proportion. Even though it had one of the lowest rates in the investments chart, the coal sector accounted for a sizable portion of the values. This accounted for all sources of energy produced in the second chart, coming in second to natural gas and nuclear power.

The energy generated from other sources was not shown in the second graphic, which had the lowest proportions for the wind and solar sectors.

Even though the wind industry had the biggest share in the first chart with 42%, it had just 2% in the second figure when comparing investments to generation. Similar to how it covered over half of the second chart with 48%, the coal industry had one of the lowest percentages in the first chart with 10%. There was probably no discernible difference between the two charts when comparing the rates of the natural gas, solar, and nuclear categories. In terms of natural gas, the percentages were 6% for investments and 27% for production. Similar changes occurred in the percentages of the solar and nuclear categories, which decreased from 8% to 1% and 21% to 22%, respectively.

Band 6.5 Answer

The pie charts show the total power generation, measured in units and broken down by various fuel sources, in Australia and France in the years 1980 and 2000.

Overall, it is abundantly evident that the main fuels utilised to produce power in Australia and France came from quite different places.

First off, compared to 1980, Australia produced 170 units more power in 2000 than it did in 1980. (100 units). While coal constituted the majority of the energy used to create power in Australia in both years, the reliance on coal for that purpose increased from 1980 to 2000. (130 out of 170 and half of the total respectively).

While other sources, such as natural gas and oil, made a smaller contribution to the generation of electricity in 2000 than they did in 1980. The amount of energy generated by hydropower increased by 16 units between 1980 and 2000.

The generation of electricity in France, which was 180 MW in 1980 and 90 MW in 2000, has increased significantly over time. This is evident when looking at the country's fuel sources. That just 15 out of 90 units of energy were generated by nuclear power in 1980 is the most startling aspect. But in 2000, it replaced coal as the primary fuel used to provide 70% of the country's power. Not to note that less different fuel sources were used to provide power in 2000 than they were in 1980.

Band 9 Answer

Pie charts are used to show how the fuel sources used to generate electricity changed between 1980 and 2000 in two distinct nations. The overall generation of electricity in 2000 was about twice as high in Australia and France. As it was in 1980, as can be seen right away from this graph. Nevertheless, both nations produced quite a bit of power from various fuel sources, albeit at varying rates.

The amount of power produced by natural gas and oil in Australia in 1980 was 20 units and 10 units, respectively. Only 4 units of electricity were generated in 2000 as a result of a dramatic decline in demand for both of these sources. Furthermore, there were no appreciable changes in the quantity of hydropower-produced electricity in 1980 or 2000.

Nuclear power appears to be more popular in France, which produced 15 units in 1980, despite the fact that it hasn't been used in Australia. It appears that nuclear power took over as the primary fuel source for electricity production around 2000. This source generated 126 units of power, which is eight times more than it did in 1980. In addition, there was no change in the amount of coal used to produce energy between 1980 and 2000. Contrarily, compared to 1980, a large rise was seen in the amount of power produced by coal.

Overall, there were significant changes in the various fuel sources used to produce the same quantity of power in Australia and France between 1980 and 2000.

Check- IELTS Writing Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Comments

No comments to show