Artist Needs Freedom to Develop Their Creativity IELTS Writing Task 2

Sayantani Barman

Mar 4, 2024

Artist needs Freedom to Develop Their Creativity IELTS Writing Task 2 is an essay topic that has 3 sample answers. The topic of the IELTS Writing Task 2 discusses how Artist need freedom to develop their creativity. The candidate has to talk about both views. So, to support the point, proper sentence structure, a grammatically correct approach, and reasonable explanations are necessary.

IELTS Writing Task 2 includes an introduction, body, & conclusion to assist applicants in achieving a good score in the writing section. Candidates must go through IELTS Writing practice papers to become familiar with a wide range of themes. Artist needs Freedom to Develop Their Creativity IELTS Writing Task 2 because the topics are broad.

Check: Get 10 Free IELTS Sample Papers
Check: Register for IELTS Coaching - Join for Free Trial Class Now

Topic: Artists need a certain amount of freedom to develop their creativity. Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express their thoughts and ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Band 8 IELTS Essay

Craftsmanship is the externalization of the abilities of a craftsman. Subsequently, there are individuals who are in favor of conferring full freedom to the craftsmen; in any case, others contradict this supposition unreservedly. In my conclusion, flexibility is essential up to a more prominent degree but there ought to be legitimate observation on their work to maintain a strategic distance from any obnoxious circumstance.

To start with, there are numerous reasons why a few individuals are in favor of giving full

opportunity to specialists. To begin with, in case they are free from any concealment that makes a difference, they can disclose all the social issues of the society without any fear. They uncover the cancerous spot and ask that society evacuate that. Any sort of imprisonment will not let them express their considerations. Furthermore, these imaginative craftsmen are the nerve of each country since of their uncommon abilities; in case they work unreservedly they, without a doubt, have the potential to create a perfect work of art that brings acknowledgment to each nation on the outline of the world.

In any case, I feel that full independence may have an antagonistic impact on the person and on society since numerous times craftsmen are seen portraying a frightful picture, including any anti-social discourse within the movies that comes about in communal riots and harms the assumptions of the individuals. These sorts of acts fetched the lives of the individuals. For example, once within the prevalent film, a few Hindu divine beings appear asking. This film has not as it brought feedback by the Hindu society but moreover sparked communal riots that have finished up within the end of a few individuals. In this manner, they ought to not be given full flexibility.

To sum it all up, in spite of the fact that craftsmen are required to be given full freedom to investigate their inventiveness, the government ought to guarantee that that exceptional act may not harm others' sentiments.

Band 7.5 IELTS Essay

Free discourse is basic for specialists to think outside the box and make groundbreaking works. There are those who accept that artisans ought to have unhindered tolerance to voice anything they like in their works. Imaginative flexibility is pivotal but I do not think it needs to be unlimited.

Specialists ought to be engaged to precise their perspectives and unique thoughts without fear of reprisal. People's interest within the expressions will develop as they are given more adaptability to precise themselves, which is able to have a positive impact on our society. The open is made mindful of an assortment of social issues much appreciated to the work of numerous creators who select to center on these themes. A noteworthy number of them advocate for reasonable treatment of all people. Numerous people in India, offended by the assault of an 8-year-old young lady, vented their sentiments in tunes that rapidly went viral online. Subsequently, it caused a parcel of people to induce disturbed, and the government had to act rapidly to halt the offenders.

The works of art, be that as it may, must not be hurtful to the community. Strife and indeed savagery have been started by works of craftsmanship, such as canvases, on different occasions.To embody, M F Hussain's canvases delineating completely bare Indian Goddesses incited far reaching distress among Hindus. Moreover, there's concern that objectification of ladies within the expressions may have an exasperating impact on the minds of receptive young persons. A few men may see ladies and not see anything more than objects of crave. In other words, craftsmanship that brings out adverse feelings among its group of onlookers contributes to a heightening of wrongdoing and violent conduct, among other adverse repercussions.

In a nutshell, craftsmen require a certain degree of opportunity to prosper, but over the top flexibility can be perilous because it motivates at least a few makers to form works that are dangerous to society.

Band 7 IELTS Essay

Representation of an artist's inner capacities, within the frame of a physical question. Hence, there are those who back giving craftsmen total opportunity, whereas others are free to voice their resistance. Opportunity is fundamental, but I think it's too pivotal to keep a near eye on their work to form beyond any doubt nothing unsavory happens.

To start, there are various advocates for total imaginative independence. To begin with, in case they are not subject to any frame of restraint, they will be able to uncover all of the social issues confronting the community without delay. They call consideration to the issue and enquire that it be killed by society. They won't be able to voice their conclusions beneath any conditions of restriction. Moment of all, these creative minds are the lifeblood of each country, and they contain the potential to form masterpieces that put each nation on the worldwide outline on the off chance that they are permitted to function unreservedly.

Be that as it may, I am concerned that complete freedom of discourse may have genuine impacts for both the person and society, as we see within the cases where specialists paint hostile pictures or incorporate anti-social discourse in motion pictures, driving to riots and insulting people's sensibilities. Individuals get killed when these sorts of things happen. A few Hindu divine beings, for occurrence, were portrayed asking in a later blockbuster. The film has not as it were scrutinized by individuals of the Hindu community, but it has too started communal riots, coming about within the passings of a few individuals. As a result, they shouldn't be given total flexibility.

In summary, craftsmen ought to be permitted total flexibility in communicating their imagination, but the government ought to take safeguards to anticipate any hurt to citizens' opinions.

Check – IELTS Writing Samples

*The article might have information for the previous academic years, please refer the official website of the exam.

Comments

No comments to show