An Increasing Number of People Can Live up to 100 Years Old IELTS Writing Task 2

It is a proven fact that the average lifespan of an individual has increased in recent years. It happened as a result of advancements made in the fields of public health, social policy, education, and economics on a global scale. Although this is a good thing, governments have nonetheless had to deal with the effects of the ageing population. First off, as the population of seniors grows, so does the budget that governments are required to set aside for medical care and retirement funds. Furthermore, there will be a correlation between the ageing population and issues with density. Growing elderly populations boost housing demand, which drives up property prices and presents a challenge for younger generations. There are several measures, nevertheless, that the government may take to fix the problem. The standard retirement age could be raised by governments, for example. The typical retirement age is 55 years old in many nations. Additionally, they may raise the retirement age to 60 or 65 years old because their senior citizens are still in excellent health. As a result, it would lower government spending on retirement-related social benefits. In addition, governments should offer financial assistance to young individuals who want to purchase a home. In conclusion, the globe has been changing quickly in recent years, which has benefited the average life expectancy. It is vital for governments to take action in order to address the problem. Because this beneficial tendency has, however, led to certain issues for people and communities.

Is it advantageous for humans to live longer or detrimental? The increased life expectancy has two negative implications. In addition to burdening society in numerous ways, it affects how someone lives their final years of life. The sentences that follow will cover both of them. Many different factors can affect how long we live. Because of improvements in science, medicine, and life quality over the last few decades, there has been a rise in life expectancy. More people than ever before are aware of their health and concerned about it. We tend to see doctors more frequently than in the past as a result. Obtaining medical assistance is also now easier than ever. The discovery, identification, and prompt diagnosis of diseases has improved, as well as the efficacy of treatments. Because they are more frail and fragile, older people tend to have higher illness prevalence. To keep the elderly mobility, it is crucial to use additional resources, such as money and labour. A quantifiable measurement of life, in my opinion, is represented by the rise in life expectancy. Age is but a number, and it doesn't fully capture all aspects of life. Life quality substantially decreases as we become older. Elderly people usually experience physical and mental health issues, and they frequently have lonesome and dismal later years. Life expectancy has grown quantitatively, but not sufficiently, in my opinion, in terms of quality. It is important to help people live longer and, more importantly, better lives. To sum up, I believe that if we can help elders lead satisfying lives, living longer can be beneficial.

It includes healthcare costs, and housing for those who cannot pay their rent. Other age groups, however, require less funding. For instance, the government only has to spend money on children's education, and the latter are healthier than the former. Governments must increase their budget in order to improve the quality of life for seniors by raising the taxes that companies are required to pay. This implies that the more people and businesses pay greater taxes, the more benefits they will receive once they reach retirement age. In this approach, the government would have had more money to increase pensions for the elderly if it had collected more taxes from the local populace. Additionally, becoming older could make the unemployment situation worse. Obviously, retired people may not be able to support their daily expenses, and they must work even after turning 65. However, a lot of them find it difficult to compete with younger people who are vying for the same jobs, in particular. Elderly people would have a higher rate of unemployment in communities because physical infirmity increases with age and causes employers to prefer hiring others. Certainly, these people have more experience in the field in which they have been employed, and the state authorities may use them in certain circumstances. For instance, writers may be hired by the government-controlled official press division. They are better able to publish related journals in local newspapers or write pieces for them. In conclusion, I think that as human lifespans increase, so will the state's willingness to provide funding and job opportunities for seniors.