An Increase In Production Of Consumer Goods Results In Damage IELTS Writing Task 2

To begin with, increased consumer product production hurts the environment in two ways: chemical byproducts from the manufacturing process and mass production of disposable goods. As more things are produced, more harmful wastes and emissions are emitted into the environment by companies. Many marine and terrestrial creatures die as a result of contaminated water sources and severely polluted air. In addition, to meet the ever-increasing demands of customers, more single-use products, the majority of which are non-biodegradable, are being developed. Despite their short lifespan, these products can linger as waste for thousands of years, converting our world into a massive landfill and endangering all living environments.

Action must be taken as soon as feasible to reduce the negative environmental implications of expanding consumer goods. First, businesses should promote the use of environmentally friendly materials. Starbucks, for example, has lately replaced plastic straws with reusable equivalents made of materials such as paper or bamboo. Furthermore, several governments are pushing the development of more environmentally friendly industrial practises. For example, many states in the United States provide tax advantages and incentives to businesses that use renewable energy, and some firms are even permitted to acquire green energy at lower prices than traditional fossil fuels.

Finally, there are two major reasons why increased consumer goods manufacturing has a negative influence on the environment. To overcome this issue, governments and businesses must work together to make production lines more ecologically friendly by using greener materials.

This essay will explain each issue and propose remedies.

First and foremost, consumer production and demand are rising due to population growth. Mass-producing consumer products in countless factories and businesses has become excessive. Disposable, non-degradable items are abundant. These products have produced many environmental problems and can remain as waste for a long time, converting our green planet into a vast landfill. Eco-friendly and biodegradable products should be consumed to reduce the harm to each living habitat and government.

The government should encourage reusable and biodegradable product manufacturers by offering tax cuts or incentives. Avoid disposable products and plastic packaging.

Chemical byproducts contribute greatly to environmental degradation. Most cleaning products, insecticides, and old-school aerosol cans contain dangerous compounds. Chemicals used in toilets, sinks, and other household appliances will eventually wash down the drain and into the water. Chlorofluorocarbons, the main propellant of old aerosol cans, depleted the ozone layer and caused climate change. Contaminated water and climate threaten massive marine and terrestrial creatures and every natural environment. People should avoid chemical items and choose environmentally friendly ones instead.

Steel and paper production require mined iron ore to make final goods. Papermaking deforests and removes dirt from enormous areas. Tree planting can improve life and meet human needs. Trees minimise urban runoff, ozone, and erosion. Consumption of fossil fuels and non-renewable resources degrades the world and environment. Solar, wind, biomass, and marine energy should be encouraged by the government.

Consumer products have become essential to daily living. Consumer goods have damaged the ecosystem. The government and citizens should reduce dangerous impacts and conserve natural resources. These measures will keep the environment sustainable.

Every day, a multitude of well-known brands are created, and people are eager to purchase them. However, it has been observed that the factories producing these branded products are negatively impacting the environment. In addition, the waste that these factories generate is being discarded in rural areas, which has horrifyingly brought natural beauty to the brink of extinction.Because it is not only diminishing the rural environment's attractiveness, but also causing residents to contract lung and skin cancer. Similarly, birds and fish that consume these prominent brands' plastic bags perish. According to a recent research by the American wild life sector, brands such as Gucci and Armani are polluting the earth's beauty.

To remedy this deteriorating condition, the government should allocate sufficient funds to the recycling industry. In addition, higher authorities should implement severe penalties on consumer goods that harm the environment. Also, stringent rules and regulations enforced by ministries issuing health and safety licences can alleviate this suffering. In addition, civil societies should visit these locations and inform locals of the dangers and dire consequences. Numerous prosperous nations have designed policies that are compatible with their natural resources. As an example, nearly every bank in the United Kingdom transmits paperless bank statements to customers via email rather than mailing them and incurring additional costs.

In light of the preceding discussion, the government must ensure that such corporations with global reputations have adequate and thorough knowledge of the negative effects they have on humans and wildlife in industrial areas. Recycling can aid in the reduction of such activities and also generate national revenue.