Advantages And Disadvantages of Hosting International Sporting Events IELTS Writing Task 2

This is utterly unworthy in the eyes of some. They are certain that these revenues ought to be invested in the nation's infrastructure and improved public services like health care, transportation, and education. Only industrialised nations host international sporting events like the Olympics and World Cup.

Because they are capable of hosting such extravagant events, as contrast to third-world countries that are unable to make use of their already limited resources to do so. The money will instead be used by their governments to support community-oriented projects. However, the argument made in this article refutes that claim because hosting such significant athletic events increases a nation's international recognition and boosts its tourism industry. However, other people support the idea of holding these events merely for the sake of attracting tourists to the nation. 

Thus, as sports fans from all over the world go to attend, the country's economy will be strengthened through tourism and entertainment. For example, thousands of sports fanatics attended the London 2012 Olympics. In the end, it resulted in a significant increase in the amount of money raised through ticket sales and employment prospects for the country. This essay firmly believes that hosting significant international athletic events will be tremendously rewarding. Despite the fact that it is expensive to host prominent athletic events. Politically and economically, they are advantageous to the host nation.

To begin with, the first provable benefit of running a global competition is that it will generate a lot of employment opportunities. Visitors from all over the world will come to the nation, stay in hotels, and use public transportation, increasing the revenue of these industries. They require personnel to handle everything. As a result, locals will have additional employment options. For instance, Qatar will host the 2024 FIFA World Cup, and up to now, the government has advertised 500,000 jobs. Additionally, it boosts the economy of the nation. Because a variety of broadcasting companies need the authorization to air the matches in other areas of the world, for which governments demand exorbitant fees. Therefore, raising the state's finances to unprecedented levels.
On the other hand, some people believe that holding an international tournament is harmful since it has a bad impact on native peoples' health. The general population will travel to the province from all corners of the globe, and occasionally they may bring new diseases with them. As a result, numerous illnesses may severely harm the local population. For instance, many countries have outlawed sporting events because of COVID, since they have a higher risk of transmitting the disease. Additionally, it occasionally gives off a negative image in the media. Foreigners may be less traditional than their hosts, but they might also behave in ways that go counter to their culture, which puts them in awkward situations.

In conclusion, both arguments have advantages and disadvantages. However, I believe that governments should set up such massive sports leagues. Because it gives residents the possibility to watch matches, which is virtually everyone's goal, and it can be the best leisure time for them.

On the one hand, others contend that holding international gaming competitions can help nations and ensure money inflows from abroad. Additionally, it raises the city's reputation and can result in large long-term financial gains and advantages from planning for a significant exhibition. Additionally, the lengthy planning and investment period will contribute to job growth and can revive downtrodden cities. For instance, the London Olympics 2012 resulted in the creation of 8000 full-time jobs and an increase in the economic production of about $200 billion.

However, some contend that holding a major sporting event like the Olympics can cost a lot of money. For which the taxpayers must pay, even though many of the facilities constructed for the event will never be used again. Moreover, major sporting events must increasingly incorporate higher levels of security, which can be expensive and restrict spectators' freedom of movement. Furthermore, significant corporate contributors are given exclusive rights to fund the athletics, which excludes many local suppliers from the events themselves. There are authorized water suppliers, quick food restaurants, and authorized soft drinks, for instance.

In conclusion, I believe that organizing sports increases the economy and raises the profile of the city. While another position holds that it will be difficult for taxpayers to pay the tax. And that it is a waste of money to construct a facility that will not be used afterward.